Another article in the Times today about the non-assimilation of Muslim Turks into Germany (remember, Turkey is supposed to be one of the most advanced and moderate Muslim countries in the world, now).
The question never asked or answered is WHY? Why do western countries have to put up with these people? Especially why they have to let these people continue to immigrate to our countries (in this case, "pull migration" by arranged marriages from their home country). Turks have been in Germany since the 50's and, if anything, as they grow in numbers, they are more insular and un-assimilated than ever.
Surely, one has to evaluate our principles and values (human rights; multi-cultural drivel; WHATEVER) and apply them logically. Yet the people in western countries and, more importantly, the Government and "opinion makers" just stand frozen like "deer in the headlight" while their societies, institutions and value systems are systematically being overrun, while they have endless "intellectual" discussions about "rights", diversity (that new "holy of holies") and other misapplied principles.
Never before in the history of human civilization have people stood so quietly by while their whole way of life was transformed: not by invasion and military conquest but in the defense of puerile and grossly misapplied principles.
Sunday, May 27, 2007
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Phew!!!!!!!! We thought were were in real trouble!
AP Story: "While nearly 80 percent of U.S. Muslims say suicide bombings of civilians to defend Islam can not be justified, 13 percent say they can be, at least rarely. That sentiment is strongest among those younger than 30. Two percent of them say it can often be justified, 13 percent say sometimes and 11 percent say rarely."
Thanks goodness. Only 13% of them want to kill us. Considering that there are estimated to be (no one knows the true number) seven million Muslims in the US now, only 900,000 want to kill us. What a relief.
I wonder: do the adherents of any other religion consider violence against their fellow countrymen a legitimate way to defend their faith? Ahhh Islam, The peaceful religion.
Thanks goodness. Only 13% of them want to kill us. Considering that there are estimated to be (no one knows the true number) seven million Muslims in the US now, only 900,000 want to kill us. What a relief.
I wonder: do the adherents of any other religion consider violence against their fellow countrymen a legitimate way to defend their faith? Ahhh Islam, The peaceful religion.
Monday, May 21, 2007
Yipeeeeeeee The End Of White America
The NY Times was positively ecstatic the other day as it reported that the number of non-white people in America now OFFICIALLY exceeds 100 million (it probably is much higher since no one knows how many 3rd world illegals there are here).
It is positively astounding how the (white) "knowledge elite" (AKA the Liberal Establishment) can't wait to have the white majority and European character of the USA surpassed (and in their fondest wish, suppressed) by any means possible. It is surely worthy of mass psychological analysis to determine what the basis of this hatred is: Is it self-hate (which is certainly prevalent among the Jewish part of Liberalia)? Maybe it is facile Marxism (certainly prevalent, too) which identifies "people of color" with the Marxist lumpen-proletariat and ascribe to them (against all evidence) the nobility of character that Marxists ascribe to the down-trodden.
Since the mass of lower-class whites (definitely not part of the Liberal Establishment) are considered to be red neck yahoos without the noble sensibilities of the knowledge elite, the Liberals romanticise the non-white under-class (genital cutting, anyone? homophobia, anyone? purdah, anyone?) as the possessors of the elite's own sensibilities, which will bring America to a higher state of enlightenment once they become the majority and can control the American electoral process (naturally, they will be smart enough to allow themselves to be guided by the elite and not by their own charlatan, 3rd world leaders). Notice how Liberals fight even against merit-based immigration, vice the "pull migration" of family "re-unification" of the under-class illegals.
The insanity of it all. Never has any society with a distinct ethnic and (superior) cultural majority been so hoodwinked into giving up its own majority status and been lulled into the suppression of their own culture in the name of such abstract (and misapplied) principles as "equality" and "fairness" and the fear of being branded "racist".
It is positively astounding how the (white) "knowledge elite" (AKA the Liberal Establishment) can't wait to have the white majority and European character of the USA surpassed (and in their fondest wish, suppressed) by any means possible. It is surely worthy of mass psychological analysis to determine what the basis of this hatred is: Is it self-hate (which is certainly prevalent among the Jewish part of Liberalia)? Maybe it is facile Marxism (certainly prevalent, too) which identifies "people of color" with the Marxist lumpen-proletariat and ascribe to them (against all evidence) the nobility of character that Marxists ascribe to the down-trodden.
Since the mass of lower-class whites (definitely not part of the Liberal Establishment) are considered to be red neck yahoos without the noble sensibilities of the knowledge elite, the Liberals romanticise the non-white under-class (genital cutting, anyone? homophobia, anyone? purdah, anyone?) as the possessors of the elite's own sensibilities, which will bring America to a higher state of enlightenment once they become the majority and can control the American electoral process (naturally, they will be smart enough to allow themselves to be guided by the elite and not by their own charlatan, 3rd world leaders). Notice how Liberals fight even against merit-based immigration, vice the "pull migration" of family "re-unification" of the under-class illegals.
The insanity of it all. Never has any society with a distinct ethnic and (superior) cultural majority been so hoodwinked into giving up its own majority status and been lulled into the suppression of their own culture in the name of such abstract (and misapplied) principles as "equality" and "fairness" and the fear of being branded "racist".
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
The Craziness Continues
"Six foreign-born Muslims were arrested and accused Tuesday of plotting to attack Fort Dix and slaughter scores of U.S. soldiers". What are these people doing here?
When will America wake-up? This isn't just about Arabs. All Muslims are toxic. Some of these people were taken in as refugees from Kosovo. We housed these "poor, mistreated" Kosovars at Ft Dix when they came in. This is how they repay America. They will never have any loyalty except to Islam. Islam is the Mad Cow disease of religions.
WAKE UP, AMERICA
When will America wake-up? This isn't just about Arabs. All Muslims are toxic. Some of these people were taken in as refugees from Kosovo. We housed these "poor, mistreated" Kosovars at Ft Dix when they came in. This is how they repay America. They will never have any loyalty except to Islam. Islam is the Mad Cow disease of religions.
WAKE UP, AMERICA
Sunday, May 6, 2007
The Inmates Are Taking Over the Asylum
The sustained drum beat from Liberals and deceived Conservatives to legitimize illegal aliens in the US has an even more outrageous note now. Last year, and this year again, we have the spectacle of people who are here illegally, prominently participating in the demonstrations to legalize their law breaking. Such audacity. People who have no legitimate standing in this country are now demanding that we change our laws for their benefit.
Certainly, the demonstrations are being arranged by self-appointed "advocates" and ethnic politicians, always looking for more "constituents" to enhance their power base. Liberals are big on the sanctity of the law and the well-ordered society but have become seduced by their vision of America as the multi-culturalist paradise and a warped sense of "justice" for the "downtrodden" to abandon any sense of the sanctity of the law. The propaganda is relentless.
The NY Times ran two articles in the last week about deportation of illegal aliens, both, of course, featuring injustice and pain to the "children", the hook to excite the sentiments of well meaning (and generally uninformed) people , especially "family-values" conservatives. In both cases, American-born children of illegals have supposedly been left parent-less by deportation of parents. There seems to be a general acceptance of the principle that all families can only be united in the USA; if these parents are so concerned, they should not have put themselves and their children in such a situation by flouting our laws. The solution is quite simple, really: take the children with you. The abuse of our constitutional provision on citizenship at birth requires new thinking, including the amendment of the Constitution, if deemed necessary. A child born to people here illegally must not be granted automatic citizenship.
What would our system of laws be if it can be construed that laws are inoperative if an illegal act harms the "children"? Defense lawyers and advocates would have a field day making one outrageous claim after another. Americans need to be a little more selective when indulging in this kind of facile righteousness.
The other facile argument that is made is that you can't deport 12 million people (resources; impact on the economy; etc.) . By this logic, any crime must be forgiven if committed often enough or if every individual criminal cannot be apprehended and brought to justice; if enough unsolved murders are committed (gang wars, anyone?) then we can't prosecute any murders. What idiotic logic. The important thing is that the crime is not forgiven and that criminals are brought to account as the forces of the law can manage it. Illegal immigration needs to be criminalized and all levels of government must be obligated to enforce the law and to turn the miscreants to the proper government agency when he/she is identified. In such a blatant act as the mass flouting of the immigration laws, all methods must be utilized, including profiling and roundups. Suggestion for the first place to start roundups: taxi garages in the large cities to get rid of at least some of the Muslims here illegally from the Middle East and South Asia; people may have conveniently forgotten the participation of Arab taxi drivers in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. America must re-establish control of its borders, even if the methods to be used against the downtrodden are not politically correct.
Certainly, the demonstrations are being arranged by self-appointed "advocates" and ethnic politicians, always looking for more "constituents" to enhance their power base. Liberals are big on the sanctity of the law and the well-ordered society but have become seduced by their vision of America as the multi-culturalist paradise and a warped sense of "justice" for the "downtrodden" to abandon any sense of the sanctity of the law. The propaganda is relentless.
The NY Times ran two articles in the last week about deportation of illegal aliens, both, of course, featuring injustice and pain to the "children", the hook to excite the sentiments of well meaning (and generally uninformed) people , especially "family-values" conservatives. In both cases, American-born children of illegals have supposedly been left parent-less by deportation of parents. There seems to be a general acceptance of the principle that all families can only be united in the USA; if these parents are so concerned, they should not have put themselves and their children in such a situation by flouting our laws. The solution is quite simple, really: take the children with you. The abuse of our constitutional provision on citizenship at birth requires new thinking, including the amendment of the Constitution, if deemed necessary. A child born to people here illegally must not be granted automatic citizenship.
What would our system of laws be if it can be construed that laws are inoperative if an illegal act harms the "children"? Defense lawyers and advocates would have a field day making one outrageous claim after another. Americans need to be a little more selective when indulging in this kind of facile righteousness.
The other facile argument that is made is that you can't deport 12 million people (resources; impact on the economy; etc.) . By this logic, any crime must be forgiven if committed often enough or if every individual criminal cannot be apprehended and brought to justice; if enough unsolved murders are committed (gang wars, anyone?) then we can't prosecute any murders. What idiotic logic. The important thing is that the crime is not forgiven and that criminals are brought to account as the forces of the law can manage it. Illegal immigration needs to be criminalized and all levels of government must be obligated to enforce the law and to turn the miscreants to the proper government agency when he/she is identified. In such a blatant act as the mass flouting of the immigration laws, all methods must be utilized, including profiling and roundups. Suggestion for the first place to start roundups: taxi garages in the large cities to get rid of at least some of the Muslims here illegally from the Middle East and South Asia; people may have conveniently forgotten the participation of Arab taxi drivers in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. America must re-establish control of its borders, even if the methods to be used against the downtrodden are not politically correct.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)