Burying the lede

As always, the NYT, in its relentless commitment to "diversity", buries important stories relating to the negative consequences of having an extensive Muslim presence in America . Two articles: "New York City Police Report Explores Homegrown Terrorism" (buried: page B3) and "Muslim Groups Oppose a List of ‘Co-Conspirators’ " (buried: page A19) get the standard Times (and most other Liberal media) treatment. One wonders why these articles which, respectively, represent an official NYC police study and US Justice Department action, and both point out (implicitly if not explicitly) the dangers posed to America by having unintegratable Muslims running around freely in this country, with the usual "rights" assertions, don't get more play in the media.

The 1st article is about an NYPD study about how Muslim immigrants can and do get "radicalized" in America (the usual BS about alienation ...blah ...blah). Not discussed, of course is why it is only Muslim immigrants who get radicalized and not immigrants from a myriad other backgrounds do not succumb by the same logic. Of course, the "game-changer" here is Islam itself: It is a doctrine of fanaticism and violence. Nothing more ... nothing less.

The 2nd article is about the US Government naming a slew of Muslim "charities" as "un-indicted co-conspirators" in a Texas terrorism trial. As expected, the usual suspects in the "civil liberties" industry and, of course, the Muslim groups themselves are howling about how this "could ratchet up the discrimination faced by American Muslims" and stigmatization of Muslims (can someone who is guilty really be stigmatized?) Again, any counterarguments are not presented (they "didn't do it", etc. etc.?), probably because they can't be. So it is all the usual obfuscation about discrimination; "diversity" of views; whatever. Again, no discussion of why no other ethnic groups have these "issues" with their charities.

Seems to be a pattern there, right?