The Perfect Solution

Why don't the Dems nominate both Obama & Clinton and get a real "co-presidency" (something like Ford tried with Reagan) or add a new office of Prime Minister, like Kenya? This would be the real "two for the price of one" - and no damaged goods, like Bill Clinton, to cause embarrassments. The domestic arrangements within the White House might be a little dicey. The most sensible, of course, would be Hillary in the presidential quarters while Obama would be in the servants' quarters with all the other Blacks (sorry... African Americans).

With a co-presidency of these two "stars", America (at least its liberal contingent) can get a lot of that burning desire for "diversity" out of its system all at once. Of course, all the other "identities" in the Democratic constituencies will have to settle for significant cabinet positions this time around (will there be enough to go around?). And the Democratic future in multicultural America is projected to be limitless, so we can look forward to permutations and combinations of identities as co-presidents until the end of time.

And Bill Clinton? Why, Chief or Protocol, of course (unfortunately, the office of Aga Keslar has been abolished everywhere!). Bill can have a high old time frisking every visiting female entering the White House - and not even get his face slapped.

Party Hearty, Democrats!

Liberal Desperation

How desperate is the liberal establishment in America (yes, there is such a thing – de facto, if not formally!) to ensure the triumph of the Democratic candidate for president, especially in this year of “diversity heaven”? For that bastion of journalistic integrity, The New York Times (aided and abetted by the Washington Post) to pull off such a shabby trick, a front page article with anonymous sources and not a whiff of solid evidence (at least, not yet; they may have a few diversionary tricks up their sleeves, yet!) is really just another symptom of liberal determination and desperation to recapture the White House at any cost, after seven years of spreading fear and loathing of the Bush presidency. If the Republicans were to somehow retain the Presidency, no matter who the candidate, it would be a slap in the face to all liberals who have spent all that energy to demonize Bush and his policies for the last seven years. It would be catastrophic for them and their perception of their own power to influence and their right to “leadership” in this country.

Unfortunately, the smear tactic will probably have at least some of its intended effect, no matter what the truth is; some of the dirt is bound to stick, which is the real objective of any smear. For many in the uninformed American public, the operative paradigm is “where there is smoke, there must be fire”.

Poor John McCain, a great American who - to the Left - is standing in the way of “historic change”. All the daggers will be out for him. Poor fool; he doesn’t understand that an old white man is now passé in America, as far as the liberal opinion makers are concerned. The Times Editorial and Op Ed writers (Rich & Co.) are full of derision for the Republican Party, which they continually berate for being the party of Whites in this new multicultural age. For a bunch who supposedly believes in the power of ideas and the quality of the individual over “ideological” concerns, they are emphatically hung up about “identity”, even though they continue to insist we are in the “post-racial” and “post-gender” Nirvana. Apparently, that does not apply to old white men (as most of the so-called intelligentsia no doubt is, also). In any case, this canard about the Republicans is surely false, as any unbiased survey of Asians and other enterprising “people of color” would, no doubt, confirm. But why would they be interested in truth, if they have “righteousness” on their side? One can only hope that the American public, once they wake up and concentrate on the election, will see through the bamboozle job and the smears of the desperate “opinion makers” and vote for America’s best, instead of the multicultural flavor of the month.

As for McCain as a candidate, he is now undoubtedly the only one left in the presidential race who still believes in upholding America’s pride and its might in the world. All other issues: economic, social or “transcendental” pale before those considerations. His only drawback is his age; he should have been the nominee at least as far back as 1996. With luck running the Democrats’ way recently, he could have some health “event” during the fall campaign, which would give the presidency to the Democrats in a walkover. It is imperative that he choose a moderate-to-conservative, relatively young and viable running-mate to assure the public in case there are any doubts about his ability to vigorously complete his term in office. Any one of a group of young mid-western Republican Governors could be a viable candidate; no Washington retreads, please! The Republicans need to bring some new faces to the fore.

"Kosovo is Serbia!"

It is outrageous how the so-called “civilized” world, the USA & Western Europe, have decreed that Serbia must give up its historic heart to the Albanian interlopers, who settled there under the protection of their Muslim brothers, the Ottoman Turks, and then proceeded to out-breed and eventually drive out the local Orthodox Christian Serb population, so that they can now claim Kosovo as their own.

The question one must ask is “why”? By what logic has western liberal opinion (and, ultimately, that is what enabled Kosovo “independence” to come about) come to the conclusion that the Kosovo Albanians, above all the “majority minority” populations in the world, must be given their independence while other ethnic groups must continue to live as locally-dominant minorities in nation states dominated by other ethnic groups. Why are they the special case? What about the Serbs in Bosnia (and Kosovo, itself); the Kurds in Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria; the Basque and Catalans in Spain; minority tribes in just about any African country? And what about “growing” ethnic minorities in the US and Europe, especially the isolationist Muslim populations in every major city in Europe and (soon) in the US, who may already form local majorities? (No one really knows the exact numbers concentrated in the ghettos of Europe, and everyone is afraid to ask).

The conventional answer, within the parameters of the victimologist mind-set of liberals and neocons, is that the Kosovo Albanians must be protected from the irredeemably genocidal, ethnic-cleansing, Serbs. Only the Serbs! Not the Turk and Arab persecutors of the Kurds (of course, the Turks have actually committed genocide within the last 100 years and the Iraqi Arabs tried to wipe out the Kurds, ohhh…. only within the last 25 years); not the various nations in Africa (let’s see… Rwanda; Kenya; Sierra Leone; Congo)! As it is, the Serbs have turned out to be particularly inept at ethnic cleansing (unless, of course, they are assisted by the UN); the final results of all their irrational and savage acts have been the imprisonment of their leaders, the loss of Bosnia and Kosovo, and the expulsion of their ethnic compatriots from Kosovo by the poor, downtrodden, Albanians. Not only are the Serbs reviled now, but they are considered to be forever irredeemable and cannot ever be trusted to treat their Albanian minority justly, even when embraced in the warm, comforting, bosom of Europe. In desperation, in an attempt to to invoke a strategic rationale, even the liberal intelligentsia is now raising the specter of a re-Sovietized Russia as a looming, dangerous, bully, flexing its muscles in support of the Serbs. Can you imagine LIBERALS being worried about a Sovietized ANYTHING? Desperate times call for desperate measures, indeed!

What is the reason for this exceptionalism, really? One suspects that it is another sad attempt by the West to mollify Muslims the world over by uncritically accepting another instance of Muslim claims for exceptional consideration; in this case, that Muslim populations in large number - when they’ve achieved critical mass in any place – cannot be ruled by non-Muslims (are you listening, America and Europe?). Muslims assert the uniqueness, cohesiveness and “unity” of Islam; it is an all-encompassing world: religious; social; judicial; commercial AND governmental. And the West? We just surrender out of fear - dressed in the “respectable” garments of multiculturalism. We must accede or face the consequence: various levels of “social unrest”, including the dreaded Jihad. We can accede bit-by-bit (see that dolt, the Archbishop of Canterbury) or in total surrender (see, for example: Bosnia and Kosovo, or upcoming events like Chechnya, Palestine, EUROPE, AMERICA!)

If there is any sense of fairness (never mind about principle or honor) left in the West, we must at least insist that the Serb historic areas in northern Kosovo, where the largest number of ethnic Serbs still live in the province (those that have not been chased out by the Albanians) must remain a part of Serbia. Assertions about the territorial “inviolability” of Kosovo are a cynical joke; it is just another part of our total surrender to the fear of Muslim reaction. Supporting Serbia’s efforts to retain the most historically and emotionally important part of their country is the least we can do to ameliorate the shame of our cowardice in the face of that savage cult called Islam.

Kosovo Now... More Later

What next? ...Marseilles, France... Birmingham, UK ...Marbella, Spain...Dearborn, MI...Brooklyn, NY...California...Arizona...New Mexico...Texas?

Another Muslim state is born in "Christian" Europe and we are the mid-wives. The rush by the West to support independence for Kosovo should be the occasion for clear thinking. After-all, what is the practical difference between Albanians infiltrating the heart of Serbia and out-breeding the local population - without integration - and the growing Muslim population in the US and Europe? When they reach a critical mass will they also be demanding ..."autonomy"? ...independence? ...SHARIA?

Also, the recent visit by the Mexican president to his "diaspora" in the USA (without so much as a courtesy call on American political leaders) should be more food for thought. The argument he makes is that they are HERE, can come any time and in any manner they want to, work for Mexico's benefit - and there is not a damn thing America can do about it. Nor is America even allowed to QUESTION the fact of their uninvited presence here.

It is way past time for euphemisms to be acceptable any longer. The need is to understand that having large (and daily growing larger!) groups of totally incompatible people is THE danger to our societies, freedoms - and maybe even territorial integrity.

In the current intellectual fashion for multiculturalism and "identity" there is no incentive for these large, cohesive and totally alien groups to ever need to, or want to, integrate into the local culture. These socially indigestible people need to be controlled and (where possible) expelled. Immigration and asylum rules have to be completely revised to only allow in SELECTED, acceptable, types of people in such limited numbers that they can be assimilated.

Sadly, the Left has won the argument by intellectual bullying and intimidation. The American and European people really don't control the argument and are basically TOLD what to believe, what is politically correct and acceptable. NO ONE seems to have the courage to speak out brutally (forcefully is no longer good enough). The bugaboo charge of RACISM has become so completely intimidating that the discussion cannot be carried out in an intellectually honest fashion, now.

Hassan Nasserallah, Your Time Is Coming

With the ignominious death of Imad Mughniyeh now accomplished, it is time for the Israelis to go after the chief thug of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasserallah.

Since the 2006 war in Lebanon, Hassan Nasserallah has crawled into a hole somewhere, occasionally sticking his head out to make a pronouncement. Well, ya Hassan, the death of your henchman yesterday should demonstrate to you that you can run but you cannot hide forever. The Jews are coming for you too.

Be prepared to join that other pig, Mohammad, very soon. Don't be too eager to go, ya Hassan; all that talk about the 70 virgins awaiting you in heaven is just to induce stupid Muslims like you to lay down their miserable lives for that barbarous cult called Islam. Be prepared instead to spend eternity in gahannam, where all murders like you belong.

Isn't It Glorious?

Whomever of the two Democratic candidates loses the nomination will have a ready excuse: BIAS.

What a wonderful triumph for Identity Politics and VICTIMOLOGY.

Someone will be validated by winning and the other will be validated by losing.

The best of all possible worlds for "progressives" everywhere.

More Liberal Obtuseness and idiocy

When it comes to multiculturalism and “identity”, whenever we think that Liberal idiocy has finally reached its limit, we always learn that there are apparently still further depths to be explored. God only knows HOW far - and how disastrously for the rest of us - they are capable of going. The archbishop of Canterbury called Thursday for Britain to adopt aspects of Islamic Shariah law alongside the existing legal system. The interesting thing about this is that he was truly shocked at the reactions to his suggestion.

Liberals are so full of their own righteousness, and certainty in the infallibility of their belief system, that they cannot comprehend how anyone could possibly disagree or take umbrage with their views. They continually deride what they consider to be “ideological” stances by Conservatives yet would be outraged if any of their orthodoxies were deemed to be ideological. To their minds, any idea they advocate is the result of reasoned discourse and is, therefore, the ONLY position logically to take on a given issue.

In this case, the dictates of the ideology of multiculturalism, and its companion non-judgementalism, require, “logically”, that credence and “respect” be given to the barbaric, unvarnished, 7^th Century code of the Arabian desert, and that it be held to be as equally valid as evolved Western laws and customs - even in 21^st Century Europe. Liberals would not feel that this would require rational discussion, since it is so central to their “cultural” view of the world; i.e., their ideology.

Unfortunately, with the Liberal domination of the major news media, academia and the political process, their orthodoxies get to become the conventional wisdom through repetition, nuancing and demonization of the opposions’ views (charges of “racism” have been so very effective for the Left for the last 40 years!)

In other words, we’ll be seeing Shariah law in practice in the West soon enough. God (or should we now say Allah?) help us.

What Kind Of People Are These?

Today's outrageous story from AP: "US: al-Qaida in Iraq training children".

The mainstream media will probably ignore this story (except for questioning the word of American military authorities, of course). No one asks ”what kind of people are these that do this to their own children?" What is more barbaric than this? "In March, police said children were used in a car bombing in which the driver gained permission to park in a busy shopping area after pointing out that he was leaving his kids in the back seat. The children were killed along with three Iraqi bystanders."

The world is outraged - most especially the Muslim world - if the US or Israel kill or hurt an Arab child, no matter how inadvertently. Yet NO ONE, not the western media or in the Muslim world, says anything about the savagery of Muslims to their own kind, not to mention to Jews in Israel (“intifada against the infidel"). Moreover, none credit or acknowledge the word of Israel and the USA when we say that these people use their own civilians, especially women and children, as human shields with the near certain "advantage" to them of sympathy when these are killed in a military engagement, as is sure to happen.

Where is the outrage? When will we wake up to the savage nature of these people and the religion that gives legitimacy to them to act in this barbaric manner?